The Hon Kristy McBain MP, Federal Member for Eden-Monaro (Minister for Regional Development, Local Government and Territories, and Minister for Emergency Management), and on 11 August 2025, has forwarded to the NSW Parliament the matter as outlined below, and has done so due to the corrupt nature of events and the covering up of criminal conduct within the legal profession within NSW.
“The NSW Police also took the time to inform me that the Law Society of NSW too was approached as part of their investigation into Terence Goldberg’s criminal activities and it was suggested to me by the officers concerned that the Law Society declined to cooperate.”
In a letter to Juliana Warner, 12 November 2021
Ms Warner did not respond
Friday, 12th November 2021
Ms Juliana Warner
President
Law Society of NSW
170 Phillip Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Dear Ms Warner
Re: Criminality within the legal profession
As you are quite aware, I have written to the Honourable T F Bathurst, Chief Justice, detailing and providing evidence of criminality within the legal profession, with such correspondences being copied to yourself. You have made no comment in relation to same.
You are quite aware that Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers made false representations to the Supreme Court of NSW in order to fabricate a debt neither owed to him nor his firm, and you are also aware of the Law Society’s original attempts to protect Mr Goldberg regarding same.
Indeed, and no doubt emboldened by the protection on offer, Mr Goldberg went on what can only be described as an uninhibited crime spree by creating two separate entities to launder monies as fraudulently obtained in the first instance.
You are quite aware that Mr Goldberg’s original fraud triggered a NSW Police investigation, and you are also quite aware that John McKenzie, the legal services commissioner, was interviewed by the NSW Police regarding such in the latter part of 2015. As you know, if Mr McKenzie had been truthful in his interview with the NSW Police, Terence Goldberg and his accomplices would have been charged with multiple counts of fraud. No charges followed.
The NSW Police also took the time to inform me that the Law Society of NSW too was approached as part of their investigation into Terence Goldberg’s criminal activities and it was suggested to me by the officers concerned that the Law Society declined to cooperate.
On or around 21st March 2018, an ex-councillor of the Law Society of NSW, and acting as an apparent envoy of same, made a clandestine and improper approach to my employer and gave the directive that my employment was to be terminated as the Law Society was ‘very unhappy’ that I was writing to it about Terence Goldberg’s fraudulent activities and the society’s ongoing covering up of such.
Of course, such clandestine approach is text book corruption. My employer refused to carry out such directive, and only part complied, presumably to assuage the individuals concerned and being fearful of the consequences if he did not. I remain employed within that firm.
Preceding the above, and on 16th February 2017, I received correspondence from Baker & McKenzie, acting for the Law Society of NSW, threatening me with court action in relation to my making public of the activities of Mr Goldberg and the Law Society’s covering up of such. Pauline Wright, the then incumbent President of the Law Society saw fit to threaten me rather than deal with the information as repeatedly brought to her attention. No court action ensued, and as you know, I continue to speak publicly.
Alas, the above was only a taster of what was to come. On 20th July 2019, two detectives arrived at my front door. It appears that John McKenzie, the legal services commissioner, made a complaint to the NSW Police, alleging that he was harassed by my writing letters to his office regarding Terence Goldberg’s conduct and his office’s turning of a blind eye to same. This was an upsetting experience (to say the least).
I wrote to the NSW Police the following morning attaching copies of four recent letters to Mr McKenzie regarding the corruption taking place within his office, as well as attaching a copy of my letter to Radhika Withana of 8th April 2019, also regarding the corruption taking place within the OLSC, and stated that if the matter were to proceed to Court the said five enclosures would form part of my defence. As I suspected would occur, Mr McKenzie, and from that moment on, decided he was no longer feeling harassed by my writing to him.
In relation to the matter at hand, Terence Goldberg’s criminal activities commenced when he claimed in an Application for Assessment of Solicitor/Client Costs (as filed with the Supreme Court of NSW on 23rd June 2010) to have acted for a party in Supreme Court proceedings when that party was in fact unrepresented and not his client. That party was a defendant in the matter, in which Mr Goldberg acted for the four plaintiffs. In his application to the Court for assessment of his firm’s professional costs, and as you well know, Mr Goldberg makes a multitude of false statements in order to make improper financial gain.
On 7th September 2012, the Law Society, while dismissing all complaints as made against Mr Goldberg in relation to the matter at hand, and after a 17 month long ‘investigation’, stated that: “The Court did not make any order prohibiting the lawyers in the proceedings from recovering their costs from their clients.”
The Order as made by the Court was that each party was to pay their own costs. The sixth defendant, being unrepresented was not Turner Freeman’s client, and had accrued no costs.
The claim as made by the Law Society of NSW that the sixth defendant was Turner Freeman’s client is absurd. The Law Society’s statement is designed to mislead and to provide protection to Mr Goldberg and his firm.
As can be seen, and manifestly so, not only has there been a consistent campaign to cover up Mr Goldberg’s criminal activities, but also a campaign of intimidation against those speaking out, lest indeed that the cover up be discovered.
However, and despite the best efforts of those involved, the numerous acts of fraud and the resulting cover ups are common knowledge within the legal arena, with a large number of legal professionals knowing what has taken place and being fearful of speaking out. That in itself tells its own story.
I trust you will maintain your silence.
Yours faithfully
“Probably the most astonishing aspect of all of this is that both the Law Society and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner are willing to put untrue statements in writing, passing such off as fact to the unsuspecting and trustful eye. It is a clear indicator not only of prolific corrupt activity, but also of a lack of oversight and nil accountability.
It should not take numerous letters over a prolonged period to solve the problem of a solicitor carrying out acts of a criminal nature. It should take only one.”
In a letter to Juliana Warner, 18 November 2021
Ms Warner did not respond
Thursday, 18th November 2021
Ms Juliana Warner
President
Law Society of NSW
170 Phillip Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Dear Ms Warner
Re: Criminality and corruption within the legal profession
I refer to the above and to previous correspondences to you in relation to same, my most recent being on 12th November 2021.
As you are acutely aware, Terence Goldberg made numerous false statements in an Application for Assessment of Solicitor/Client Costs in order to make improper and fraudulent financial gain. You are also aware of Mr Goldberg’s ongoing criminal endeavours, and the ongoing cover up of such by both the Law Society of NSW and John McKenzie, the Legal Services Commissioner.
Forgive me if I repeat myself, however, I do so for the sake of clarity. Terence Goldberg acted for all four plaintiffs in Supreme Court proceedings 2009/00291458-001 (“the 2009 proceedings”). Pigott Stinson Lawyers acted for the first to fifth defendants, and the sixth defendant, an incorporated association, was an unrepresented party.
In his application to the Court for assessment of his firm’s supposed professional costs, Terence Goldberg claims that he acted for the four plaintiffs and the incorporated association, while also claiming there were five plaintiffs and five defendants. As you can see, the lie is simple and plain for all to see.
Further, and not content with falsely claiming his costs against the sixth defendant, Mr Goldberg then conspired with the liquidator to take all other funds as owned by the above said sixth defendant, with Mr Goldberg and the liquidator placing the remaining funds, as well as other funds of an unknown origin, into a Trust of their making. Again, the criminality is plain and entirely obvious.
Despite the obviousness of the wrongdoing involved, both the Law Society and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner state that no wrongdoing has taken place. Quite evidently, both of those overseers are turning a very deliberate blind eye. Such is undeniable.
My letter to you of 12th November 2021 dealt with the Law Society’s covering up of the matter. However, We need to look a little more closely too at John McKenzie’s direct input into the affair.
Find attached copies of correspondence from John McKenzie to me of 2nd June 2015 and 7th August 2017, and copy of correspondence from Mr McKenzie to Ms Roseanne Beckett of 25th June 2018. As can be seen, John McKenzie provides false statements to both myself and Ms Beckett in order to improperly dismiss complaints as made to his office, and not so coincidentally, regarding the same solicitor.
As we know, and as previously stated, Terence Goldberg acted for the four plaintiffs only in the 2009 proceedings, however in separate Local Court proceedings, as heard on 26th February 2016 (“the 2016 proceedings”), and in open Court, Terence Goldberg repeats his lie that he acted for the sixth defendant in the 2009 proceedings, while also claiming that the plaintiffs in the 2009 proceedings brought their action on behalf of the sixth defendant in same. Both of those statements as made by Mr Goldberg in the 2016 proceedings are perjorous.
A complaint was made to the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner regarding Mr Goldberg’s perjorous statements, which, predictably, was instantly dismissed by John McKenzie. As can be seen from Mr McKenzie’s letter of 7th August 2017, Mr McKenzie lies once more and claims that Terence Goldberg acted for the sixth defendant in the 2009 proceedings. As everyone knows, the sixth defendant was unrepresented in same.
Preceding the above, and as can be seen in Mr McKenzie’s letter to me of 2nd June 2015, Mr McKenzie admits that Terence Goldberg made false statements in his application to the Court for his costs, however, Mr McKenzie provides the caveat that Mr Goldberg perhaps acted on instructions in doing so. Again, Mr McKenzie’s improper protection is on full display, as a solicitor, when in dispute with his clients and making an application to the Court for the assessment of the firm’s proposed costs, does not seek instructions from his (presumably now former) clients. Mr McKenzie’s statement is clearly false, and clearly deliberately so.
Again, and in open Court on 6th April 2018, Terence Goldberg stated that the sum of $30,000.00 as belonging to Roseanne Beckett was in his firm’s trust account. This statement by Mr Goldberg was knowingly false, with that sum already having been improperly removed from Turner Freeman’s trust account. Ms Beckett thereafter sought a trust ledger in relation to that sum, and, unsurprisingly, given that the monies were no longer there, Mr Goldberg refused to provide such.
Quite understandably, and given Terence Goldberg’s refusal to provide a trust ledger in relation to her monies, Ms Beckett made a complaint to the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner. Ms Beckett’s request for a trust ledger fell within the provisions of the Legal Profession Uniform Law.
However, and as can be seen in John McKenzie’s letter to Ms Beckett of 25th June 2018, and while at the same time improperly dismissing Ms Beckett’s complaint, Mr McKenzie defies statute and states to Ms Beckett that “as a client, you are not entitled to a copy of the law practice’s trust account ledger…”
As you would know, Mr McKenzie’s statement is not only untrue, but also breaches sections 52(4)(a) and 52(4)(b) of the Legal Profession Uniform General Rules 2015. Mr McKenzie’s statement is extraordinary, if not utterly outrageous.
In essence, we have a solicitor who can do, and indeed does, whatever he pleases, with the Law Society of NSW and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner lying to the public in order to cover up Terence Goldberg’s decidedly criminal transgressions. It cannot be made much clearer than that.
Further, all the above does not include John McKenzie’s dismissal of another complaint made against Terence Goldberg in relation to a forged court stamp on unfiled court documents (in relation to the 2016 proceedings), with such seemingly carried out either by Terence Goldberg himself or under his direct instruction.
It is a simple statement of fact that the Law Society and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner have not only protected Terence Goldberg despite his egregious and disgraceful conduct, but have in fact provided direct assistance to his criminal endeavours by turning a very distinct blind eye.
Probably the most astonishing aspect of all of this is that both the Law Society and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner are willing to put untrue statements in writing, passing such off as fact to the unsuspecting and trustful eye. It is a clear indicator not only of prolific corrupt activity, but also of a lack of oversight and nil accountability.
It should not take numerous letters over a prolonged period to solve the problem of a solicitor carrying out acts of a criminal nature. It should take only one.
It is my well earned experience that there is little or no honour to be found in the honourable profession.
Yours faithfully
Click here for original pdf version of the above letter (with attachments).
“It is evident not only that Roseanne Beckett’s monies had already been removed from Turner Freeman’s trust account, but also that Terence Goldberg’s statement in Court on 6th April 2018 regarding that money is untrue. As we have seen, it is not the first occasion that Mr Goldberg has provided untrue statements to the Court while under oath.”
In a letter to Juliana Warner, 19 November 2021
Ms Warner did not respond
Friday, 19th November 2021
Ms Juliana Warner
President
Law Society of NSW
170 Phillip Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Dear Ms Warner
Re: Criminality and corruption within the legal profession
I refer to the above and to my letter to you of yesterday.
In such letter of yesterday, I stated that funds as belonging to Ms Roseanne Beckett had been improperly removed from Turner Freeman’s trust account. Such statement requires to be expanded upon.
Roseanne Beckett has a protracted history with Terence Goldberg and his firm, ie Turner Freeman Lawyers. Ms Beckett spent 10 years in prison for offences she did not commit and was ultimately awarded compensation by the State of NSW. Terence Goldberg acted for Ms Beckett in her claims against the State.
Terence Goldberg commenced proceedings against Roseanne Beckett as she directed the State of NSW to pay her compensation funds to her directly and not into Turner Freeman’s trust account. Roseanne Beckett was decidedly cautious regarding her compensation funds being paid to Turner Freeman Lawyers given Terence Goldberg’s well known dishonesty.
Ms Beckett stated, in writing, that she would pay Turner Freeman’s bill of costs when such was received in itemised form. Terence Goldberg declined to do so, and as above, commenced proceedings against her instead of providing that itemised bill of costs.
In the final hearing of the above proceedings and during cross-examination, as took place on 6th April 2018, Terence Goldberg stated that the sum of $30,000.00 as belonging to Ms Beckett remained in his firm’s trust account. This statement by Terence Goldberg is untrue.
On 4th May 2018, his Honour handed down judgment and made the Order that Roseanne Beckett pay Turner Freeman’s costs by way of a lump sum costs order of $300,000.00. Such Order was made due to a provision in Turner Freeman’s costs agreement.
Given Terence Goldberg’s statement in Court that $30,000.00 of Ms Beckett’s money resided in his firm’s trust account, Ms Beckett, of course, paid Turner Freeman the amount of $270,000.00, and sought a receipt for the payment of the full amount while also seeking a trust ledger showing not only the existence of Ms Beckett’s money in Turner Freeman’s trust account, but also the movement of that money into Turner Freeman’s office account.
On 10th May 2018, Mr Goldberg wrote to Ms Beckett advising of the movement of monies from his firm’s trust account to the firm’s office account, together with an office account receipt in the sum of $270,000.00. Find such attached. As can be seen, Terence Goldberg not only declines to provide the receipt for the full amount but refuses to provide Ms Beckett with the requested trust ledger, therefore placing him in breach of set down legislation.
Also find attached letter from Terence Goldberg to Ms Beckett of 22nd May 2018 acknowledging the receipt of Ms Beckett’s $30,000.00 into trust on 2nd December 2015. (You will of course note Mr Goldberg’s misleading statements in his letter of 22nd May 2018 to Ms Beckett.)
As you know, I am employed within a law firm and deal with the accounts on a day to day basis. It is really very simple. When a client’s money is transferred from the trust account to the office account, a receipt is issued to the client for that sum. If requested, a trust ledger is produced to illustrate the movement of those and any other monies as owned by the client.
Very obviously, if the sum of $30,000.00 was moved into Turner Freeman’s office account, together with the input of Roseanne Beckett’s $270,000.00 payment to Turner Freeman, an office account receipt would have been issued in the amount of $300,000.00. As can be seen in the attached letter from Terence Goldberg to Roseanne Beckett of 10th May 2018, and also in John McKenzie’s letter to Roseanne Beckett of 25th June 2018, this did not occur.
It is evident not only that Roseanne Beckett’s monies had already been removed from Turner Freeman’s trust account, but also that Terence Goldberg’s statement in Court on 6th April 2018 regarding that money is untrue. As we have seen, it is not the first occasion that Mr Goldberg has provided untrue statements to the Court while under oath.
As you are quite aware from yesterday’s correspondence to you, John McKenzie, the legal services commissioner, has turned his head sideways to all wrongdoing as carried out by Terence Goldberg, and continues to provide favour to same.
As can also be seen, and as illustrated in Mr McKenzie’s letter to Roseanne Beckett of 25th June 2018, Mr McKenzie is prepared to tell any lie necessary in order to continue his protection of Terence Goldberg.
We need to understand why John McKenzie is going to such lengths to protect a solicitor carrying out acts of serious criminal wrongdoing.
Yours faithfully
Click here for original pdf version of the above letter (with attachments).
“You are aware too that the conduct involved relates to the breaching of Court Orders and a fraud as perpetrated on the Court by a practising solicitor.
Despite the incontrovertible nature of the evidence of such, you consistently refuse to either comment or respond. I can only conclude that you find acceptable or even condone the behaviours as brought to your attention.”
In a letter to Joanne van der Plaat, 4 May 2022
Ms van der Plaat did not respond
Wednesday, 4th May 2022
Ms Joanne van der Plaat
President
Law Society of NSW
170 Phillip Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Dear President
Re: Corrupt activity within the legal profession
You have been made aware of improper practices at play not only from within the legal profession, but also within the Law Society of NSW. I have written to you directly on a number of occasions regarding same.
You are aware too that the conduct involved relates to the breaching of Court Orders and a fraud as perpetrated on the Court by a practising solicitor.
Despite the incontrovertible nature of the evidence of such, you consistently refuse to either comment or respond. I can only conclude that you find acceptable or even condone the behaviours as brought to your attention.
However, perhaps I should be grateful that you, unlike others in various positions of overseeing authority, have not yet sought to threaten me in an attempt to bring about my silence regarding the above said issues of serious solicitor misconduct.
As you are indeed fully aware of the nature of the wrongdoing taking place, you are also fully aware of the intimidatory conduct of those around you. For the purpose of reference, and in relation to same, I attach copy of letter to you of 7th January 2022.
Again, I await your response.
Yours faithfully
“You are aware that the Law Society, and despite indisputable evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Mr Goldberg being provided to it, dismissed each and every complaint as made in relation to Mr Goldberg’s extraordinary conduct.”
In a letter to Joanne van der Plaat, 24 May 2022
Ms van der Plaat did not respond
Tuesday, 24th May 2022
Ms Joanne van der Plaat
President
Law Society of NSW
170 Phillip Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Dear Ms van der Plaat
Re: Criminal conduct
On 16th September 2015, and during a NSW Police investigation into the activities of Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers, the NSW Police wrote to me and stated that ‘Inquiries are still ongoing with the Law Society of NSW as to the nature of previous complaints made against Terence Goldberg.’
As you are quite aware, the NSW Police commenced a criminal investigation into Mr Goldberg’s activities due to several false statements as made in an Application for Assessment of Solicitor/Client Costs, which duly enabled Mr Goldberg to improperly obtain a judgment debt in the District Court in the amount of $124,661.90 against a party for whom he did not act. Mr Goldberg acted for the four opposing parties in the matter.
You are quite aware also, that the complaints as made to the Law Society of NSW related directly to the above (as well as to other various matters of misconduct), with a copy of the aforementioned Application for Assessment of Solicitor/Client Costs being made available to the Law Society during the Society’s then own live investigation into Mr Goldberg’s misdeeds, which, as you know, preceded the NSW Police’s separate criminal investigation.
You are aware that the Law Society, and despite indisputable evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Mr Goldberg being provided to it, dismissed each and every complaint as made in relation to Mr Goldberg’s extraordinary conduct.
Given no sanction was made against Terence Goldberg by the NSW Police, the Law Society of NSW must have misled the police in their criminal investigation and enquiries.
Yours faithfully
“As can be seen, Mr Goldberg’s conduct constitutes not only a contempt in the face of the Court but also a fraud upon the Court itself, with Mr Goldberg having provided a false instrument to the Court in the first instance to obtain monies by deception, while at the same time breaching an Order of the Court in doing so.
In an E-mail to Joanne van der Plaat, 13 June 2022
Ms van der Plaat did not respond
From: Symn Waters
Date: Monday, 13 June 2022 11:22 AM
Subject: Conduct of the Law Society of NSW – compromising of the integrity of the Honourable Court
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
[email protected]
Dear President
On 6 December 2021, I wrote to you directly informing you of improper conduct as taking place within the Law Society of NSW. At that time you were the Senior Vice-President of the organisation.
Quite specifically, I provided you with a copy of three letters to the then President of the Society, Ms Juliana Warner, of 12 November 2021, 18 November 2021, and 19 November 2021, with all of such outlining in very clear detail issues of the covering up of solicitor wrongdoing. As you are keenly aware, there has been a long-running campaign to stifle the content of those same correspondences.
Let us turn our minds to the first of such letters, and I attach a copy of same for the reference of those to whom this E-mail is copied. As can be seen on the second page of such, attention is brought to the conduct of Ms Pauline Wright, ex-President of the Law Society, who turned a deliberate blind eye to the fraudulent conduct of Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers during her then incumbency. Sadly, there is little or no question as to the fraudulent nature of Mr Goldberg’s improper activities.
On Friday, 10 June 2022, you delivered the swearing in speech wherein Ms Pauline Wright was appointed as a Local Court Magistrate. You further placed a post on LinkedIn and publicly stated that you were “Thrilled this morning to be able to deliver the swearing in speech before Her Honour Local Court Magistrate Pauline Wright, former President of the Law Society of NSW.” (Copy attached.) It is evident that you delivered such swearing in speech knowing that the integrity of the Honourable Court was being compromised in your so doing.
Lest there be any question in relation to the fraudulent conduct of Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers, I attach affidavit of myself as sworn on 12 March 2022, and a copy of which you have received on a number of separate occasions. As can be seen, Mr Goldberg’s conduct constitutes not only a contempt in the face of the Court but also a fraud upon the Court itself, with Mr Goldberg having provided a false instrument to the Court in the first instance to obtain monies by deception, while at the same time breaching an Order of the Court in doing so.
Given the gravity of the matter at hand, I copy this E-mail to the Honourable Justice Andrew Bell, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of NSW, and also to the Judicial Commission of NSW.
I and a large number of others are appalled at what we see taking place before us, and indeed what is taking place quite openly.
Yours faithfully
“So, what does a member of the public do when we have open criminality taking place within the legal profession and equally open improper activity at the Law Society of NSW when attempting to cover up that criminality? Where does one go?
In an E-mail to Joanne van der Plaat, 28 June 2022
Ms van der Plaat did not respond
From: Symn Waters
Date: Tuesday, 28 June 2022 09:28 AM
Subject: Conduct of the Law Society of NSW – covering up of criminal activities
To: [email protected]
Cc: c[email protected]
[email protected]
Dear President
Despite having had ample time to do so, you have offered neither comment nor response to my E-mail to you of 13 June 2022. In fact, you have not responded to a single communication regarding issues of misconduct as taking place within the Law Society of NSW.
As you are quite aware, Terence Goldberg of Turner Freeman Lawyers provided false statements to the Supreme Court of NSW in order to make improper and fraudulent financial gain before carrying out other brazen acts of serious wrongdoing, and doing so while being watched quite openly by the Law Society of NSW and the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner, and with both of those overseeing authorities consistently refusing to take proper action.
Some years ago and before the happening of any of the above, with Mr Goldberg acting equally as brazenly and with us knowing exactly what he was doing, myself and another physically visited the Law Society of NSW seeking guidance in relation to Mr Goldberg’s improper conduct. The Law Society told us “come back when it’s done”.
As you well know, we did come back when it was done, however, were faced with further brazen conduct, this time from the Law Society itself, with the Law Society making false and misleading statements of its own in order to protect Mr Goldberg and his disgraceful and distinctly unlawful behaviours.
Indeed, you are aware, too, of the blizzard of threats as issued by the law firm retained by the Law Society of NSW in attempting to cover up the above, with the most recent being on 25 February 2022, and during your own incumbency as President. Thankfully, that law firm has now fallen silent.
Of course, you are aware that that particular law firm, and despite numerous requests to do so, was unable to provide any particulars of the blanket claims it made against me, nor indeed was it able to provide me with the basis of the Supreme Court proceedings it repeatedly claimed the Law Society was going to commence, and indeed was going to commence against me with no further notice to myself.
So, what does a member of the public do when we have open criminality taking place within the legal profession and equally open improper activity at the Law Society of NSW when attempting to cover up that criminality? Where does one go? Further, you are fully aware also of Pauline Wright’s use of the above said law firm during her own incumbency as Law Society President to issue threats regarding my making public of Mr Goldberg’s exploits, with Ms Wright now being a Local Court Magistrate, and with yourself having delivered the swearing in speech at Ms Wright’s investiture. Quite obviously, the options for remedy are somewhat limited.
I leave below my E-mail to you of 13 June 2022 with its enclosures intact. As can be seen from such, both the criminality and the corruption is taking place quite openly. Let us call it for what it is.
I copy this E-mail to the Honourable Judge Peter Johnstone, Chief Magistrate of the Local Court of NSW, and also to the Judicial Commission of NSW.
Yours faithfully